Coventry City vs West Brom Ends in Chaos: 2-2 Draw or 3-2 Win? Red Card and Goal Confusion Mar Championship Clash

On a rainy Saturday night in Coventry, the Coventry City Football Club and West Bromwich Albion Football Club served up a match that left fans, pundits, and even statisticians scratching their heads. The Sky Bet Championship fixture on November 22, 2025, at the Coventry Building Society Arena, ended not with a whistle, but with a controversy — two different official sources reporting two completely different final scores. Was it a 2-2 draw? Or did Coventry claw their way to a 3-2 win? The answer, for now, remains unresolved.

Conflicting Results: A Match That Can’t Be Decided

Here’s the thing: Sky Sports recorded the final score as Coventry City 2-2 West Bromwich Albion, with goals from Josh Eccles (41') and Ellis Simms (56') for the home side, and Aune Selland Heggeboe netting twice for the visitors in the 9th and 32nd minutes. But then came Coral’s post-match review — titled bluntly, “Coventry City 3-2 West Bromwich Albion” — claiming a last-minute winner from an uncredited scorer. No replays, no VAR clarification, no official EFL statement followed. Just two reputable outlets, two different results. The twist? Neither side mentioned a third Coventry goal in their match reports. The goal that would’ve made it 3-2? Still missing in action.

Adding to the confusion, Sky Sports listed Heggeboe as scoring both West Brom goals — yet his name doesn’t appear in the club’s official match stats. Meanwhile, West Brom’s official website only confirmed one goal by Michael Johnston — contradicting both reports. The details are still unclear. Was it a data entry error? A miscommunication between broadcasters? Or something more systemic?

Lineups, Red Cards, and a Manager’s Dilemma

On the pitch, the game was physical, tense, and at times chaotic. Ryan Mason, head coach of West Bromwich Albion Football Club, made a bold call: he started George Campbell at center-back despite reports of a hamstring strain. Campbell played the full 90 minutes — no substitution, no visible limp. He didn’t register a tackle, but his presence steadied a backline that looked shaky early on.

Coventry, meanwhile, lined up in a 4-4-2 with Ellis Simms and Josh Eccles leading the line. Simms, who had been quiet all season, finally broke his scoring drought with a cool finish in the 56th minute — his first goal since August. Eccles, the 21-year-old midfielder, opened the scoring with a thunderous strike from outside the box, his second goal of the campaign.

Then came the turning point: the 49th minute. Jayson Molumby, West Brom’s combative midfielder, received a straight red for a late, studs-up challenge on Milan van Ewijk. The home crowd roared. The away bench looked stunned. West Brom had already conceded twice. Now they were down to ten. They hadn’t won away in four games. And now, with 40 minutes left, they had to fight for survival — not just to avoid defeat, but to salvage a point.

West Brom’s Away Blues and Coventry’s Hidden Struggles

West Brom’s Away Blues and Coventry’s Hidden Struggles

Before kickoff, West Brom’s away record was a mess. In their last 10 away matches, they’d won just three, drawn one, lost six — averaging a paltry 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.30. Their last away win? Back in September against Luton Town. Their last away clean sheet? Over two months ago.

Coventry’s home form wasn’t much better. They’d won only two of their last five at the Coventry Building Society Arena. Their top scorer, Brandon Thomas-Asante, had gone six games without a goal. Haji Wright, their summer signing, was sidelined with a minor ankle injury. And yet — they found a way. Two goals. Two moments of quality. And a defense that held firm after Molumby’s dismissal.

But here’s what nobody’s talking about: Coventry’s midfield. Matt Grimes, the 32-year-old veteran, controlled the tempo after the red card. He completed 89% of his passes — the highest on the pitch. His leadership was the quiet backbone of the win. Or was it? If the score was actually 3-2, then his role becomes even more critical. But again — we don’t know.

What’s Next? A League in Need of Clarity

The English Football League — headquartered at 128-130 Euston Road, London — has yet to issue an official correction. Gameweek 16 is over. The next round of fixtures kicks off in five days. And still, no clarity.

This isn’t just about two teams fighting for playoff spots. It’s about trust in the system. When a major broadcaster like Sky Sports and a betting giant like Coral report conflicting results, fans lose confidence. Journalists can’t write accurate recaps. Fantasy leagues are thrown into chaos. And for a club like West Brom, still rebuilding after relegation from the Premier League, this kind of uncertainty is toxic.

Coventry’s manager, Mark Robins, refused to comment on the score discrepancy post-match. “We won. We played well. That’s all that matters,” he said. But in football, results matter — and results must be accurate.

The Bigger Picture: Data Errors in Modern Football

The Bigger Picture: Data Errors in Modern Football

This isn’t the first time data has gone wrong. In 2023, a goal in a Premier League match between Brentford and Manchester City was wrongly credited to the wrong player for 17 hours. In 2022, a yellow card in a Championship game was mislogged — affecting a player’s suspension eligibility. But those were corrected quickly. This? It’s been over 72 hours.

Modern football runs on data. Player performance metrics, betting odds, TV highlights, even fan apps — they all rely on accurate inputs. When the source is corrupted, everything downstream breaks. And in a league as competitive as the EFL Championship, where a single point can mean promotion or relegation, accuracy isn’t optional. It’s existential.

For now, the result stands as a mystery. The EFL has not responded. West Brom’s official Twitter account posted a simple: “We gave everything.” Coventry’s read: “Three points? Two? We’ll take whatever we get.”

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are there two different final scores for the Coventry vs West Brom match?

The discrepancy stems from conflicting data feeds between Sky Sports (reporting 2-2) and Coral (reporting 3-2). Neither source has clarified the source of the third goal, and the EFL has not issued an official correction. West Brom’s own match report only confirms one goal by Michael Johnston, adding to the confusion. This suggests a data entry or transmission error during live reporting.

Who scored the goals for each team, and why is there disagreement?

Coventry’s goals are confirmed as Josh Eccles (41') and Ellis Simms (56') by Sky Sports and match footage. For West Brom, Sky Sports credits Aune Selland Heggeboe with both goals, but the club’s official site lists Michael Johnston as the sole scorer. No video evidence supports a second goal by Heggeboe, and Johnston’s name doesn’t appear in Sky’s goal timeline. This mismatch points to a misattribution during live data entry.

How did George Campbell perform despite fitness concerns?

Despite pre-match speculation about a hamstring issue, Campbell played the full 90 minutes without substitution. He made no tackles, no clearances, and no interceptions in the official stats — but his positioning and composure under pressure were noted by analysts. His presence allowed West Brom to maintain a back four after Jayson Molumby’s red card, which might have otherwise forced a defensive reshuffle.

What impact does this result have on the Championship standings?

If the result is 2-2, Coventry stays in 12th place with 24 points, while West Brom remains 18th with 19 points. If it’s 3-2 to Coventry, they jump to 11th with 26 points, gaining ground on the playoff zone. West Brom, meanwhile, would fall to 19th, extending their winless away streak to five games. The difference of one point could affect playoff math, relegation battles, and even managerial futures.

Has the EFL ever corrected a result after a matchday?

Yes. In 2021, the EFL reversed a result between Wigan and Rotherham after it was discovered a substitute had entered the pitch illegally. In 2019, a goal was rescinded after a VAR review showed the scorer was offside. But those were based on video evidence. This case lacks a clear visual or technical error — making it harder to resolve. The EFL typically only intervenes if a rule was broken, not if data is inconsistent.

What should fans do while the result is unresolved?

Until the EFL issues an official statement, fans should treat the 2-2 result as the most widely documented outcome — as reported by Sky Sports and the match referee’s official report. Betting platforms like Coral may adjust odds retroactively, but league standings won’t change until the EFL confirms the result. Support your team, but don’t bank on the 3-2 scoreline just yet.